By Errol Townshend
Nobody will deny that over the course of history various "isms" (colonialism, imperialism, racism, sexism, ageism) and, in the case of the Caribbean, slavery and regionalism (aka insularity) have negatively impacted lives, some more than others.
But we ought to be careful, not only during these current tumultuous times but also looking back in history, that we don’t attribute every setback, failure, disappointment to one or more of these "isms", and thereby distort history.
I am driven to that view after reading the first installment of Romeo Kaseram's take on Andy Ganteaume's unique cricket career (ICW, January 9). The lament, perpetuated over the years by many others before Kaseram, is that Andy was badly treated by “The Establishment” (that is, the white colonial class) which ruled West Indies cricket during his time. It is argued that this is why, despite scoring 112 in his first Test innings in 1948, he never batted again, the only man in the long history of Test cricket to have achieved his curious distinction.
Nonsense.
Sure enough, some folks have been victims of one or more of these "isms". But sometimes happenstance, good luck, bad luck, quirks and yes, our own faults and choices, cause disappointing results. Ganteaume is one such case.
Initially, because of insularity, West Indies had a policy of picking a local captain for each of the island Tests. That changed in 1935 when Jackie Grant of Trinidad captained in all four Tests and led West Indies to 2-1 victory over England, their first ever series victory. In 1948 when England returned, a curious arrangement was struck before the tour started. George Headley of Jamaica (who had Bajan antecedents) was appointed captain for the Barbados and Jamaica Tests, Trinidad's Jeff Stollmeyer for the Trinidad Test and Bajan John Goddard for the British Guiana Test.
Ganteaume, meanwhile, had started his career with a bang back in 1941 as a specialist wicketkeeper, hitting 87 coming in at No. 8. But he soon lost his place behind the stumps, not to a white player, but to Sookval Samaroo, a specialist keeper, but with no pretensions to batsmanship. Ganteaume, his batting skills now unearthed, returned to the Trinidad team in short order as a specialist batsman. But his scores were underwhelming (9, 2, 13, 37, 3, 4, and 9). He could consider himself lucky, back in those days, not to have been consigned to the ashcan of West Indies cricket history there and then because opportunities then were few and far between.
It can be strongly argued that it was wicketkeeping that prolonged his career. In his second coming as a wicketkeeper/sometimes opening batsman/sometimes specialist batsman his performance between 1943-47 improved somewhat (18, 20, 28, 9, 13, 97, 42, 68, 24, 57, 10, 112, 27, 85, 10, 14, 159, 14, 0, 5, 36, 50, and 1). In the Colony matches against England in 1948, preceding the Trinidad Test, he struck a purple patch. In the first match, as wicketkeeper/opener, he hit 101 and 47 not out. In the second, as a specialist batsman, he hit 5 and 90. However, he was not included in the original 12 for the Test. He had taken a whole day to score 101 and so the selectors sent to Barbados for the veteran George Carew. The Bajan was a dashing but inconsistent opener who had make a duck in his only Test innings way back in 1935, but who had performed reasonably well for his island subsequently, and made 46, 81 and 30 in the two preceding colony matches against the tourists. Was this bad luck for Andy? Carew ended his career with a modest Test average of 28.33 (one century) but a first class average of 34.7 (three centuries) to Andy's first class average of 34.81 (five centuries). Same difference.
Then, as good luck would have it, Carew's intended opening partner, Stollmeyer, was injured. Ganteaume was the obvious replacement.
Ganteaume was subsequently blamed for making his 112 in the first innings too slowly and thus causing the Test to be drawn. This was an unfair criticism because it was a two-hours rain delay on the final day, with the West Indies chasing 141 runs in three hours, that was the real cause.
In any event, only one of these two openers could play in the next Test, because a spot had to be found for Goddard, the pre-selected captain. While Ganteaume made a solid but unspectacular 112, his partner Carew made a swashbuckling 107, smashing England's most dangerous bowler, Jim Laker, all over Queens Park Oval. The contrast could not have been sharper. Carew was chosen over Andy for the next Test. That wasn't bad luck or prejudice. Just a proper exercise of plain selector discretion.
When the team was selected for the India tour months later, Carew was again preferred to Andy as the backup opener to Allan Rae and Stollmeyer. Clifford McWatt, a more competent keeper but not as good a batsman as Andy, was chosen as the backup to incumbent Clyde Walcott.
Stollmeyer, who attracts much of Andy's vitriol in his autobiography My Story, pointedly encouraged Andy not to give up the gloves. In a very warm letter dated August 10, 1948, Stollmeyer says: "Go behind the sticks next season and really give wicketkeeping plenty of attention. I think it will pay you dividends." Andy wouldn't listen. He dismissed vice captain Stollmeyer's advice thus: "Jeff wanted me to continue keeping wicket for Trinidad and Tobago in addition to our many successful partnerships together, as his letter and the note in his book that he gave me would show. I found combining the two specialist functions physically and mentally taxing, and I will continue to argue that such a request was unreasonable... When there is a long innings and after ten minutes the keeper has to open, that is not a reasonable request, I submit. I did not think it necessary for me to keep wicket to keep a place in the team…”
Ouch.
This from a man trying to crack a lineup of Rae and Stollmeyer, the most successful opening pair before Gordon Greenidge and Desmond Haynes, the three Ws, stylish Robert Christiani (another backup keeper) and allrounders Gerry Gomez and John Goddard! Contrast that with Pakistan's wicketkeeper/opener Imtiaz Ahmed (average 29.28), a fixture in his country's team from its Test debut: "I batted for Pakistan from Numbers 1-8 as asked by the captain or manager. Mostly I was asked to open the innings when the opposition had a fearsome pace attack.” He made 122 opening in the same 1958 Test Sobers broke the world record; he opened with Hanif Mohammed (337) and made 91 in that marathon match-saving total of 657-8 in the first Test; he made 135 v India at Chennai (1961) as opener.
No such inhibitions for England's Alec Stewart either. He opened and kept wicket in many Tests, most famously hitting 118 and 143 against West Indies in Barbados 1994.
Andy was also overlooked for the 1950 tour of England despite his 147 in the trials. He states: “After that tour (India) I was again left out of the one to England, I was told that he (Gerry Gomez, an influential member of The Establishment) said I missed the bus when I gave up wicketkeeping.”
Did Ganteaume make a fateful, career-damaging decision to give up wicketkeeping? I think he certainly did. Look what happened afterwards.
From its Test debut West Indies always looked for a wicketkeeper/batsman. The first captain, Karl Nunes (average 30.62 highest score 92), was one such, followed by Ivan Barrow who hit 105 as an opener versus England, a rare milestone in those days; Errol Hunte (average 33.20) who opened and kept wicket; Derek Sealy (average 28.11, highest score 92). After the War, Clyde Walcott filled the bill perfectly, even opening and keeping on debut.
But after Andy gave up the gloves following the 1948 Tests look at what happened. Specialist batsman Christiani, a fixture in the team, filled the role as backup keeper versus England (1950); Simpson Guillen (average 26.00, highest score 54) went to Australia/New Zealand (1951); West Indies Davis Cup tennis star Ralph Legall (average 10, highest score 23) and Alfred Binns (average 9.14, highest score 27) kept versus India (1952), Clifford McWatt (average 28.85, highest score 54), better known as ‘McCat’ for his nine lives in the Jamaica Test of 1954, kept versus England (1954); Clairmonte DePeiaza (average 31.16) had his hour of glory when he defied Australia for 122 with Denis Atkinson (219) in 1955 but didn't pass 16 in his other seven innings. Andy was a better batsman than any of them. He watched them from the pavilion.
Even today, much less back in the 1950s, a player age 36 was considered "old". Justifiable or not, that was the thinking. Yet, at the age of 36, having played little first class cricket and made very few runs since 1950, the same Establishment he rails against (with Kaseram’s blessing) recalled him for the 1957 England tour. He was not a success. He averaged 27.58 (highest score 92). Despite the failure of the other openers, Bruce Pairaudeau and Nyron Asgarali, he failed to crack the lineup for the first four Tests. Worrell and Sobers had to fill the gap. Rohan Kanhai, a brilliant batsman, but "a fieldsman with gloves" behind the stumps, kept wicket for three Tests before replaced by debutant Franz Alexander batting at Number 9. Andy watched from the pavilion.
By the time the team reached the Oval for the fifth Test, the rubber was already won 2-0 by England. In such circumstances it is not unusual for players who have not made the cut to be given a game. Paceman Tom Dewdney was brought in to replace Roy Gilchrist.
And what of Andy?
As a lawyer/journalist I prefer to rely on evidence and facts, not polemics and propaganda. So let's hear it from the mouth of the accused, so to speak. In his autobiography Andy states: "Just before the fifth Test I got 92 against Glamorgan... Frank Worrell had only just been brought on the selection committee... In the dressing room before the end of the match Frank made a hint about my playing in the forthcoming final Test. I did not respond but back in London we went out for a meal and there I told him I did not wish to play if it meant that my roommate Nyron Asgarali, a professional, would not. The pros got 75 pounds a Test match. In the event, I was in the 12 and on the morning of the match, on entering the dressing room, a gaunt-looking captain Goddard said to me, ‘Andy you are twelfth’.”
Perhaps just as well. As Andy looked on from the pavilion West Indies were routed for 89 and 86 by Jim Laker and Tony Lock on a brute of a pitch, including eight ducks.
Thus Andy Ganteaume kept his unique record and a good story for Kaseram – and many others before him – to write about how “The Establishment” did him in.
(Errol Townshend is a veteran journalist who has been watching West Indies cricket since 1950, and was a selector and administrator in Canada.)