February 16, 2011 issue | |
Opinions |
|
When the Jackal enters... |
|
![]() |
The Middle East and North Africa are a collection of autocracies or oligarchies with varying degrees of stability and human rights adherence. Most are Muslim, barring Jewish-occupied Palestine. Several claim to follow Sharia law. Egypt constitutionally is a “socialist democratic system”; “Islamic jurisprudence is the principal source of legislation” based on a multiparty political system. There are at least 24 Parties, dominated by Mubarak’s conservative National Democratic Party which won the first election in 2005 with 88% of votes, and 81% in 2010! Shades of Forbes Burnham! |
While this month’s events might please repressed Egyptians and Hamas (Palestine) whom Mubarak suppressed as rigidly and effectively as the Israelis did, albeit without tanks and bombs, they trouble Israelis who worry about continuity of the 1979 Peace Treaty concluded with Anwar Sadat and rejected by the rest of the Arab world. Succeeding Sadat on his assassination, Mubarak imposed emergency rule and prospered thereby through 30 years of dictatorship, vote-rigging, corruption, with US providing Egypt over $1 billion yearly since 1979, enough for diversion. (On February 11th the Swiss Government froze Mubarak’s accounts but these are said to be a small fraction of his wealth. Others are considering the same. Both of Mubarak’s sons are involved in banking and finance and the family has large holdings in Egypt and elsewhere.) He was seen as a proxy for US Middle East policy which favoured and pampered Jews enabling Israel in those decades to dismantle Palestine dispersing and subduing opposition and killing many. Mubarak did little to aid oppressed Palestinians while accumulating wealth at civilian expense in the fashion of every US-installed dictator, each manipulated like puppets, with fat bribes, ostensibly for security, but really to facilitate business. (The list is too long for this space).
|
|
Time presses on with Sunday night ironing |
|
![]() |
I entertained the thought recently that perhaps I might want to try the dry cleaning laundry up the street. It is not that I dread late Sunday evening when it comes to the point-of-no-return with me having to finally iron my shirts for the work-week ahead. I listen to the hiss of steam rising from beneath the iron. I love the smell of the spray-on starch from an aerosol tin. I admire my handiwork with the iron in the sharpness of the seams and the artistry in my gliding around the hard-to-press spots by the buttons. Perhaps it is the standing in one place that I don’t like. Or it is the to-and-fro with the iron that creates the wearisome monotony. Or maybe it is the |
plain repetitiveness of ironing that made me think that the dry cleaners were worth a visit.
|
|
< Editorial/s | |